Part of the MABTW blog network - Last Updated Blog - El Chauvinisto
One can always tell when an “anonymous” poster is female. They use words differently than men. Women use words to vent, while men use words to convey meaning. That is why Stephen Hawking is hard to read, every chapter is packed with facts, theory, hypothetical constructions, etc. On the other hand, something like Betty Friedan’s books are full of blathering nonsense and basically emotional venting. Easy to read, but empty of meaningful content.
For a time, I enjoyed the back and forth of arguing with feminists, but it is much like arguing with an insane person. No matter how well you state the obvious, they will always insist you admit your true identity as an insectoid alien from Pluto. The women I’ve debated become irrational very quickly, resort to insults and profanity almost immediately, and many of their comments are presented as 15 page indictments which often conform to customary legal writing guidelines.
I do have a very dedicated cadre of trolls that will eventually find me on my new blog home at mabtw.com. I really do wish they had something to offer beyond: “I’m hurt - fuck you.” There is a historical reason why women haven’t been on the vanguard of philosophy, science or engineering. Those pesky facts, they always get in the way. Better to throw a fit, a couple of insults, and walk away smirking.
It might be fun for these feminist trolls, but it adds nothing to the discussion. As Alessandra Eakin noted, women have a Hurt Feelings Memory Bank. They can list your last transgression in detail. Not even 50,000 kindnesses will erase the memory of that one slight. They nurse these minor wounds and keep them festering. They rarely get beyond the “feelings” of a situation and thus contribute so much less than men. I welcome debate with a rational feminist, but that may be asking too much.

COMMENTS / 2 COMMENTS

More whining by Rafael/v7000/Duncan Idaho…”anyone who disagrees with me must be a feminist troll whine tear!” When you’re done flapping your gums, girly, how about taking up one of my two challenges:

1) You said: “Blogger sent me a notice that felix_phl@yahoo.com said my blog encouraged violence against women” POST IT HERE SO WE CAN ALL SEE IT. If it’s fake (like your Advice Columnist crap) you’ll get more legal trouble than you can imagine. But if it’s real, why, you have nothin’ to worry about, do you girly? So what’s holding up you up??

2) You said “The advice columnist letters are real, they come from old Cosmo magazines”. Fine. POST THE ISSUE DATE of the six articles I SAY ARE FAKE FRAUD PHONY; these are the ones I reposted in Dick’s suggestion forum. Why won’t you just PROVE ME WRONG?? Should be easy…IF you’re tellin’ the truth.

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again: Rafael=Duncan Idaho (of “Eternal Bachelor)=v7000 of the now defunct “Trashy Women” = Islamic Century author. And ALL of them equal one whiny little b!tch!

So how ’bout it? You gonna take up my challenge? Or are you gonna do what you do best: Roll over like a submissive dog and expose your genitals, a small trickle of urine running down your leg…

Felix added these pithy words on Mar 13 06 at 5:57 pm

Still waitin’…

Felix added these pithy words on Mar 13 06 at 6:36 pm

SPEAK / ADD YOUR COMMENT
Comments are moderated.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Return to Top

Debating the Feminists

Posted on 03.13.06 to Uncategorized. Subscribe to follow comments on this post. 2 comments. Add your thoughts or trackback from your own site.

FRESH / LATEST POSTS